Main Article Content
The improvement of crops quality and productivity, and the environment quality is an important problem worldwide. Due to the increased need for agricultural products and climate change, new tools has been developed that enhance plant tolerance against biotic and abiotic stresses .Therefore the use of plant biostimulants (formally known as bioeffectors), may be promising alternative to chemical methods, has become common practice in agriculture in stimulating growth .In this context our experiment was conducted in a conventional peach orchard in the Fez-Meknes region. Peach is an important cultivar in Morocco in general ; thanks to its good productivity with high-quality fruits.We chose peach for its place in the region's arboreal sector, its vulnerability to the effects of water stress and its growing demand in the market. The objective of our experiment is to study the effect of stimulants on the yield and quality of Peach (Prunus persica) in the face of biotic and abiotic stresses in the Sais Plain. The experiment was spread over two seasons on three-year-old trees. It consisted of the application of organic biostimulants (Vitazyme, Protifert LMW10, Protifert LMW6.3, Protifert Zinc and Naturfer), in order to study their effects on: fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter, flesh weight, core weight, Sugar content and titratable acidity. The analysis of the results via the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software showed that the organic biostimulants studied have, in general, a positive effect on the improvement of the yield of the peach tree. This effect is particularly marked in the second year. Regarding the quality of peaches we found that the application of biostimulants increases the content of sugars in the fruit.
Halász J, Kodad O, Hegedus A. Self-compatibility in Prunus: Accidents in transposon traffic? Acta Hortic. 2019 ;1231 : 123–129.
Hribar J, Vidrih R. Impacts of Climate Change on fruit physiology and quality. Proc. . 50th Croat. 10th Int. Symp. Agric. 2015 :42–45.
Yakhin OI, Lubyanov AA, Yakhin IA, Brown PH. Biostimulants in Plant Science: A Global Perspective. Front. Plant Sci. 2017;7.
Saour G, Ismail H, Hashem A. Impact of kaolin particle film, spirodiclofen acaricide, harpin protein, and an organic biostimulant on pear psylla Cacopsylla pyri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). Int. J. Pest Manag. 2010 ;56 :75–79.
Lisiecka, J. et al. The effect of animal protein hydrolysate on quantity and quality of strawberry daughter plants cv. ‘Elsanta’. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus. 2011 ;10 :31–40.
Morales-Payan JP. Response of ‘Banilejo’ mango to foliar applications of a biostimulant based on free amino acids and potassium. Acta Hortic. 2015 ;1075 :121–126.
El-Shazly SM, Mustafa NS. Enhancement yield, fruit quality and nutritional status of Washington navel orange trees by application of some biostimulants. Acta Hortic. 2015 ;1065 :1303–1310.
Csizinszky AA. the Effect of ‘Soar’ Biostimulants on Fruit Yield of Bell Peppers in Consecutive Seasons. 23,.
Saa S, Olivos-Del Rio A, Castro S, Brown PH. Foliar application of microbial and plant based biostimulants increases growth and potassium uptake in almond (Prunus dulcis [Mill.] D. A. Webb). Front. Plant Sci. 2015 ;6 :1–9.
Storer K, Kendall S, White C, Roques S, Berry P. A review of the function, efficacy and value of biostimulant products available for UK cereals and oilseeds. Ahdb ; 2016.
Spann TM, Little H. A. Effect of Stimplex ® Crop Biostimulant on Drought Tolerance of ‘ Hamlin ’ Sweet Orange. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 2010 ;123 :100–104.
Lucini L. et al. The effect of a plant-derived biostimulant on metabolic profiling and crop performance of lettuce grown under saline conditions. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam). 2015 ; 182:124–133.
Kocira A. et al. Effect of foliar application of a nitrophenolate–based biostimulant on the yield and quality of two bean cultivars. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam). 2017 ;214 :76–82.
Meng X, Han J, Wang Q, Tian S. Changes in physiology and quality of peach fruits treated by methyl jasmonate under low temperature stress. Food Chem. 2009 ;114 : 1028–1035.
Kocira S. Effect of amino acid biostimulant on the yield and nutraceutical potential of soybean. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2019 ;79 :17–25.
Zaghloul A, Ennab H. Comparative Effect Of One Synthetic Biostimulants And Microbial Biostimulant (Azospirillum lipoferum) On Yield And Quality Of Washington Navel Orange Fruits. J. Plant Prod. 2015 ;6 :1861–1876.
Kunicki E, Grabowska A, Sękara A, Wojciechowska R. The effect of cultivar type, time of cultivation, and biostimulant treatment on the yield of spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.) . Folia Hortic. 2010 ;22 :9–13.
Grabowska A, Kunicki E, Sękara A, Kalisz A, Wojciechowska R. The Effect of Cultivar and Biostimulant Treatment on the Carrot Yield and its Quality. Veg. Crop. Res. Bull. 2012;77:37–48.